Subject: Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:11:11 +0100 |
> I was just reminded that page numbers aren't always integers. Example: > pp. iii-vi. > > I guess that settles it then; better to use substrings in this case. On the contrary, to handle those you are going to first have to convert to numbers otherwise you are just "substring" isn't really going to be the right relation for roman numerals. Having converted to numbers you could use either approach to truncate the upper range limit before converting back to roman numerals. (You'll probbaly need a different truncation algorithm, in this case, if you want to trucate at all). David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, J-P S | Thread | Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, Bruce D'Arcus |
Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, David . Pawson |
Month |