Subject: RE: [xsl] document() path relative to current document From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:07:45 -0000 |
> Thanks for your quick reply. But the way you describe it, can > not work, > because the document function needs a string to tell which document to > access. I tried it out and i didn't work. David is right (as always, except when he's typing too fast). If the argument to the document() function is a node-set, any relative URIs in the values of those nodes are interpreted relative to to the base URI of the node that contains them. If you want more control than this, you can use the second argument of the document function to supply a base URI, but this is very rarely needed. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() path relative , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() path relative , "Robert Sösemann" |
Re: [xsl] FXSLT example code is unr, Andrew Watt | Date | RE: [xsl] document() path relative , Michael Kay |
Month |