|
Subject: Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 03 Mar 2005 20:22:29 +0000 |
>>>>> "David" == David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> You can remove that assumption of an intelligent optimizer, by
>> placing the common sub-expression into a variable.
David> only in xslt2, the sort key has to be a single xpath, so
David> you can't bind variables in xpath1.
Ah. I tend to forget about that old xslt 1.0 thing :-)
I also note that the original problem doesn't state which processor or
version of xslt.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum, Dimitre Novatchev |
| [xsl] Finding the position of node , Jan Rademan | Date | Re: [xsl] escaping/entities on the , Kevin Rodgers |
| Month |