RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa

Subject: RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000

> Confused Michael. Yours, Colins and .....?
> 
> Whose is the third please?

XML Spy 2005

Michael Kay

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default, (continued) Michael Kay - Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:00:07 -0000 David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:15:38 GMT Pawson, David - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:45:51 -0000 M. David Peterson - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 02:05:24 -0700 Michael Kay - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000 <= Michael Champion - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:02:54 -0500 Wendell Piez - Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:30:36 -0500 Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:25:12 -0600 Andrew Welch - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:40:11 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default, (continued)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:00:07 -0000
- David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:15:38 GMT
- Pawson, David - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:45:51 -0000
  - M. David Peterson - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 02:05:24 -0700
  - Michael Kay - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000 <=
- Michael Champion - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:02:54 -0500
  - Wendell Piez - Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:30:36 -0500
- Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:25:12 -0600
- Andrew Welch - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:40:11 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Michael Champion
Re: [xsl] Problem with grouping the, Olaf Meske	Date	RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home