Subject: RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000 |
> Confused Michael. Yours, Colins and .....? > > Whose is the third please? XML Spy 2005 Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Michael Champion |
Re: [xsl] Problem with grouping the, Olaf Meske | Date | RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Michael Kay |
Month |