RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default

Subject: RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000
> Confused Michael. Yours, Colins and .....?
> 
> Whose is the third please?

XML Spy 2005

Michael Kay

Current Thread