RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default

Subject: RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: "Andrew Welch" <ajwelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:40:11 -0000

Wasn't the real mistake that Microsoft made with MSXML was the whole
side-by-side/replace mode fiasco? Many people would've missed wd-xsl
altogether had replace mode been the default.  I believe it was only
with good intentions that the side-by-side installation was invented
(they didn't want to break existing code) but with hindsight that was
wrong decision.

cheers
andrew

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default, (continued) Michael Kay - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000 Michael Champion - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:02:54 -0500 Wendell Piez - Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:30:36 -0500 Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:25:12 -0600 Andrew Welch - Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:40:11 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Pieter Reint Siegers	Thread	[xsl] RE: Operational system date, Daniel O'Donnell
[xsl] How to select nodes with expl, Olaf Meske	Date	RE: [xsl] How to select nodes with , Michael Kay
	Month