Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:59:31 -0600

"terrific" = good

Its root is the Latin terrere, to frighten. English (and I suppose other
languages) has an interesting way of reversing the meanings of some
adjectives over time. This is one of those adjectives. One informal use of
"bad" means good, too. And "awful" and "awesome" have traded meanings from
what they had about 5 centuries ago.

Now that I am WAY off topic....

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)

Antsnio Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2005 02:47 PM
Please respond to


Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the
"terrific" here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the
sense of "terror" or in the sense of "uau!".

Or simply putting it it's   :)    or    :(   ?

Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform
agnostic thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to is

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
<pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support,
> use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0.
> NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET
> Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore all
> credits go to its creator, Michael Kay.
> NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about
> slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to this -
> can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon transformations in the
> background and return to you the output, which is the same as running
> from the command line, and thus has the same performance.
> Cheers,
> <prs/>

Current Thread