<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 May 2005 05:36:24 +0100
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Dimitre> Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise
    Dimitre> following the fact that the value of
   
    Dimitre>        my:f($x) is my:f($x)

    Dimitre> is generally not guaranteed to be true()

It isn't, as if either function returns an atomic sequence, you get a
type error.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Kevin Rodgers Thread Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] Linear sequence of moves , Colin Paul Adams Date Re: [xsl] Refactoring parsing code , Micah Dubinko
Month