Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:40:59 +1000
> To be pedantic, my:f($x) is my:f($x) should always evaluate to true()
> in the absence of errors. But that can be taken as read.

This is the problem it shouldn't, according to the XSLT 2.0 spec:
there are cases when
        my:f($x) is my:f($x)

evaluates to false().

This happens when my:f() is defined in such a way that it creates new
node(s) on every evaluation.


Cheers,
Dimitre.

Current Thread