RE: [xsl] Schema aware transformations

[Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes. A basic processor differs from a schema-aware
> processor only in that it
> rejects certain things that an SA processor accepts.
> If you're within the
> subset that a basic processor can handle, then the
> two give the same
> results. 
I'll have a smile on this remark :)

> 
> I think the other important thing for many people
> will be the ability to
> store a pre-compiled schema persistently. For that,
> you'll have to watch
> this space a little longer. 
Hi Mike, Are you proposing this as a new feature in
XSLT 2.0 .. It looks good to me ..

Regards,
Mukul

> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com