Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:15:41 +1000
On 21 Sep 2005 22:10:14 +0100, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>    Dimitre> As a consequence, I think that it would be very helpful
>    Dimitre> to have in XSLT facilities, which provide warning
>    Dimitre> diagnostics whenever a built-in template rule is invoked,
>    Dimitre> or to turn off built-in template rules at all.
>    Dimitre> Probably vendors of XSLT processors could provide such
>    Dimitre> facilities?
> The former is easy to do (but should not be on by default, as it would
> annoy too many people).
> The latter is equally easy, but is non-compliant behaviour. So it must
> be a non-default option. In which case, I think the warning is better.
> But why limit your request to vendors? Wouldn't you prefer free
> software XSLT processors also to have such an option?


Pardon my bad English, but for me you are also a "vendor", and a "free
vendor" :o) of an XSLT processor.

Dimitre Novatchev

Current Thread