Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Sep 2005 05:52:47 +0100
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Dimitre> Pardon my bad English, but for me you are also a
    Dimitre> "vendor", and a "free vendor" :o) of an XSLT processor.

Well, it was really only tongue-in-cheek :-)

    Dimitre> Probably vendors of XSLT processors could provide such
    Dimitre> facilities?
    >>  The former is easy to do (but should not be on by default, as
    >> it would annoy too many people).  The latter is equally easy,
    >> but is non-compliant behaviour. So it must be a non-default
    >> option. In which case, I think the warning is better.

The real point of my post was to find out which option you would
prefer - a warning, or a suppression.
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread