|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XML fragment as a param ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:13:14 GMT |
Fraser> Is it possible to pass in an XML fragment as a param and
Fraser> then access nodes in the fragment as well as those in the
Fraser> main source instance ?? For example could I compare a
Fraser>I haven't come across data: before. I thought that the document() function
Fraser>accepted a resolvable URI as a parameter, so does the use of data: provide a
Fraser>sort of resolver itself then ?
Note thet document(data: isn't for the case that you are passing in an
XML fragment, it is for the case that you are passing in a string with
some XML markup.
A simpler is just to pass in the XML document itself as the parameter.
then your xsl just looks like
<xsl:param name="otherdoc" select="/.."/>
...
<xsl:apply-templates select="$otherdoc/whatever/path/you/need"/>
...
Thus your xsl doesn't need any functions at all.
How you pass in a node st (typicall, but not always as a DOM object of
some sort) as a parameter depends on the system you are using. Certainly
xalan saxon etc can do this (from the java api, if not from the command
line) but I can't say about xml spy.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XML fragment as a param ?, Fraser Goffin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XML fragment as a param ?, Colin Paul Adams |
| RE: [xsl] [XPath20] Decoding URIs, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XML fragment as a param ?, Colin Paul Adams |
| Month |