Subject: RE: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code" From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:40:09 -0000 |
> I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience > have people had comparing the runtime performance and > throughput of XSLT > vs. "raw Java code"? I would guess the only scope limitation I could > give for this would be using Xalan and JDK 1.4.2. Please don't measure with Xalan and assume that the results apply to XSLT processors in general: other processors might be 10 times faster, or more. I see many XSLT applications where the performance is dominated by parsing, tree-building, and serialization. In such situations, Java isn't going to be any faster. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Experiences comparing perform, Karr, David | Thread | Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Jon Gorman |
[xsl] Experiences comparing perform, Karr, David | Date | RE: [xsl] Error: when distance betw, Michael Kay |
Month |