Subject: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code" From: "Karr, David" <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:56:35 -0800 |
I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"? I would guess the only scope limitation I could give for this would be using Xalan and JDK 1.4.2. Is there any reasonable data, either within these constraints, or outside of them? I personally feel that XSLT will perform perfectly fine against raw Java, even ignoring other advantages, like maintenance issues with complex transformation code in Java, but I seem to be hearing resistance from some people who claim it's a "known fact" that XSLT is slower than pure Java. That may be true in trivial examples, but I think real transformations will likely show that XSLT is just as fast, or faster.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Regarding Question #22978, moshe malaver | Thread | RE: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] passing parameters betwee, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Michael Kay |
Month |