|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 Jul 2006 23:51:19 +0100 |
>>>>> "Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so
Tracey> important and so difficult for me.
Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and
Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy? Those made a lot of
Tracey> sense to me.
Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement
Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not
Tracey> necessary.)
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann |
| Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann |
| Month |