Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 Jul 2006 23:51:19 +0100 |
>>>>> "Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so Tracey> important and so difficult for me. Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy? Those made a lot of Tracey> sense to me. Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not Tracey> necessary.) http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann |
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Tracey Zellmann |
Month |