Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?

["Tracey Zellmann" <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks . I'll take the time to digest it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?


> > > > > > "Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>    Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so
>    Tracey> important and so difficult for me.
>
>    Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and
>    Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy?  Those made a lot of
>    Tracey> sense to me.
>
>    Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement
>    Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not
>    Tracey> necessary.)
>
> http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html
>
>
> --
> Colin Adams
> Preston Lancashire