Subject: Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:56:07 +0100 |
> They have 2 different specs and one can exist independently of the > other xpath can exist without xslt but not the other way round. The situation is (exactly) the same in XQuery, but XQuery is usually regarted as an extension of XPath: that is XQuery is a single language, with more constructs than XPath) whereas XSLT is usually described is a two-language construct consisting of xslt constructs and Xpath constructs. It's pretty much a marketing angle which way you describe it really. Although on the surface the XQuery spec doesn't defer to XPath for the specification of the Xpath-part of XQuery but rather just includes copies of the definitions, whereas the XSLT spec does refer to the xpath spec, this is just an artifact of the way the stylesheets making the public html versions of the spec are built. The XPath and XQuery documents are built out of a common xml document base. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, omprakash . v | Thread | RE: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Passing XML Tree to a jav, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |