Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:23:19 +0100 |
> Is it usual to talk of O(n) with respect to an > implementation, or should the term apply strictly to an algorithm? A very good question. However, declarative languages don't express an algorithm, so you can only really discuss the time complexity of the implementation, or of an assumed implementation. It's a real problem: without knowledge of the implementation you have no way of knowing, for example, whether xsl:copy-of takes constant time or time proportional to the size of the tree being copied. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Andrew Franz | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Andrew Franz | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |