Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Checking that an element's value has the desired datatype? From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:43 +0200 (CEST) |
bryan rasmussen wrote: > On 10/17/06, Florent Georges wrote: > > I don't say it is not correct to use matches() to check > > the lexical representation of a value, in order to try > > to deduce some information about its type. > I was pointing out that while Roger may have phrased it > that way the reference to schematron seems to indicate > that what he actually means is that with matches he can > constrain the value. Maybe. > It is perhaps an arrogant assumption > on my point but I think he means that he thought that > matches, using Unicode Regex would more closely and easily > match the requirements expressed in the schema because of > basically using the same constraint 0-9. I can't see how using matches() can "more closely and easily match the requirements expressed in the schema" than a schema validation itself. And as Mike pointed out, what about " 1 "? > > But then you have to be aware you'll not get the type, > > you'll get guesses. > As stated earlier I don't believe he wants to get the > type, he wants to constrain the value, and as for me I am > not at all interested in the type. Maybe. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Checking that , bryan rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Checking that , bryan rasmussen |
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet i, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet i, Michael Kay |
Month |