|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:32:57 +0100 (CET) |
Yves Forkl wrote:
Hi
> From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "="
> operator allows to test an atomic value (like the string
> that the attribute value is coerced into) against a
> sequence and returns true if the atomic value equals any
> of the members of the sequence.
Yes, while other things.
> If this is true, where I can find more information about
> this feature and its prerequisites? I have searched the
> relevant W3C specifications up and down, but in vain.
This is in the XPath 2.0 REC:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-general-comparisons
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions !
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, David Carlisle |
| RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 2 Feb 200, Andy Carr1 |
| Month |