Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML

Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:05:39 GMT
>  From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "=" operator allows to 
> test an atomic value (like the string that the attribute value is 
> coerced into) against a sequence and returns true if the atomic value 
> equals any of the members of the sequence.

yes, this is just teh same as xpath1 really which also allows = to be
used with node sets (the xpath1 equivalent of sequences) and retues true
if any item in the right hand  set is equal to an item in the left hand
set.


this will be in xpath REC document, or any xpath tutorial.

David

Current Thread