Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:05:39 GMT |
> From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "=" operator allows to > test an atomic value (like the string that the attribute value is > coerced into) against a sequence and returns true if the atomic value > equals any of the members of the sequence. yes, this is just teh same as xpath1 really which also allows = to be used with node sets (the xpath1 equivalent of sequences) and retues true if any item in the right hand set is equal to an item in the left hand set. this will be in xpath REC document, or any xpath tutorial. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Saxon auto-recognition of, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML , Florent Georges |
Month |