| Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference betwen functions and templates From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:13:43 +0200 (CEST) | 
David Carlisle wrote:
  Hi
> it does mean that you can rewrite the vast majority of
> existing named templates as functions if you wish.
  I think that the output state is the only context component that you
can't simulate in a function by passing it as a parameter.  I hope I
don't forget any other.
  Regards,
--drkm
      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference bet, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] XPath for the selected node, v vijith | 
| RE: [xsl] Parsing to a file..., Naschke, Pete | Date | Re: [xsl] Parsing to a file..., David Carlisle | 
| Month |