RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portability problems

[Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, August 16, 1999 9:40 PM, Matthias Clasen
[SMTP:clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> 
> But the patch fails if unsigned int != size_t, doesn't it ?
> The CVS version of OpenJade needs more fixes for gcc-2.95 anyway. 
> Here is another untested idea: Wouldn't it be enough to move the
> potential duplicates to different files to avoid the conflict ?
> 
I'm no gcc expert, but looking at the docs I see a -frepo flag which seems
to allow you to get rid of the _inst files completely. Surely that would be
better? Or is there a catch?


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist