Subject: Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists as RTF lists? From: David Miller <dmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:26:30 -0500 |
"Maltby, David G" wrote: > > > > In short, my most basic requirement is to let users edit > > their documents > > using their standard authoring tool (Word), but still maintain the > > documents in a format-neutral way (DocBook). > > Although personally appalled at this concept, you may be able to buy a > solution at > http:\\www.i4i.com with their S4/TEXT product. > > Speaking from the "been-there-done-that-dept.", you are setting yourself up > for a life of pain. > Definitely a true statement! It's too late for me, though. But for anybody thinking of getting involved in a similar project, run away! Thanks for the pointer on S4/TEXT, looks interesting. -- Dave DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, cfm | Thread | Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, Ed Nixon |
Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, Tony Graham | Date | Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |