Subject: Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and TeX backend From: Ron Ross <ronross@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 09 Oct 2001 14:47:57 -0400 |
Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > > Only in recent openjade releases, I think. i fear many people do not > > use the current jade. > > Probably if someone worked on the huge performance issue that 1.4devel > has, more people would use it. Already hearing perf complaints from > users when switching from sgmlspl to jade, I stick with 1.3. [brief departure from my lurker status] Many people may in fact be still using 1.2, or 1.1.2 (whatever the last release by James Clark was). It bothers me that many of the (unfortunately few) links to jade one finds on the Net point to Clark's page. Should we be "evangelizing" OpenJade to the extent of systematically informing site-maintainers of the current implementation? I've done so at least once, I think, but sometimes thought it a little presumptuous... Ron DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, Yann Dirson | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, David Carlisle |
Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, David Carlisle | Date | (dsssl) Upgrading jadetex, Lane Stevens |
Month |