RE: Style vs. transformation

Subject: RE: Style vs. transformation
From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 10:43:39 -0500
I second the requirement for multiple passes.  I could foresee another
use besides just breaking a problem down into smaller pieces.  It could
also be useful if someone already has an existing XSL script for a class
of documents (A).  The user has a second class of documents (B) that are
almost the same as A.  Wouldn't it be nice if the user could just
augment the script for A by putting a transformation pass at the front
that transforms B to A?  Sure they could invoke the XSL processor twice,
but this is a big performance hit on some systems.  Wouldn't it be nice
if one could do it with a single invokation of the XSL processor?


>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Sean Mc Grath [SMTP:digitome@xxxxxx]
>Sent:	Wednesday, March 04, 1998 6:39 AM
>To:	xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject:	Re: Style vs. transformation
> [snip]
>I would like to see something in XSL that supported
>"chaining" the flow object tree resulting from one
>stylesheet transformation into another stylesheet.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread