Subject: Re: Data misuse (was Re: template matching..) From: Marcus Carr <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 23:35:56 +1000 |
Sara Mitchell wrote: > It also makes it clear that versioning needs to be considered as > you > design your DTDs. You can include version numbers in the PUBLIC > ID for the DTD. Unfortunately, with XML, there is no requirement > for > a processor to pay attention to the public ID, but it could also > be done in the namespace. This could be used as a signal on the > client-end that the data they are receiving may use a different > standard than their current stylesheet. I may not have a DTD - the data may be a loose agglomeration of database fields and live-feed weather reports - well formed, but that's all I know about it. This is the new datacentric world... > I know all of this sounds awkward, and you're undoubtedly right > that more specific and efficient methods need to be worked out. > So we have more to work on, right? I think so, but I haven't progressed past the question yet... -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Data misuse (was Re: template m, Sara Mitchell | Thread | Re: Data misuse (was Re: template m, Guy_Murphy |
Re: Notation, Marcus Carr | Date | RE: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to, Sall, Ken |
Month |