Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100 |
> Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write > Mike> > Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::* > Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)"> > > Are you _sure_ that's easier than > > <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]"> > Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Getting desired node on t, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] xalan-java xslt node value, Jason S |
Month |