|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Which one's faster From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:53:34 +0100 |
Angus McCollum wrote:
> It is not a choice to be made. Example 1 does not work because
> xsl:attribute is designed to exactly what you are intending. In
> particular, you can not place an xpath query (i.e. @url) in the
> output directly. The XSLT processor does not know that is should be
> interpreted as an xpath query. The same query in the select
> attribute of the xsl tag is interpreted as an xpath query and thus
> works.
In case this is misinterpreted: you can insert the value resulting
from evaluating an XPath expression into an attribute without using
<xsl:attribute>, as long as you use an attribute value template:
<a href="{@url}">...</a>
has the same effect as:
<a>
<xsl:attribute name="href">
<xsl:value-of select="@url" />
</xsl:attribute>
...
</a>
but the first is shorter and easier to read and write than the second.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Which one's faster, McCollum , Angus | Thread | RE: [xsl] Which one's faster, Michael Kay |
| RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo |
| Month |