Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:06:03 -0300 |
Jim, Thanks for your replay. But this will tie me up with a specific technology instead of begin adhering straight to standards and open tech. For sure this technology is one step ahead of the standard but unless is a standard by itself (which I doubt from the msgs coming to this list), will be difficult to see applications running smoothly in, lets say, at least 90% of the clients machines. As I said, I've been playing a little bit (for sure not as much as you did guys) with the XML/XSLT technology and is time to wrap up and take in concern what I mention before, being able to deploy a site with minor environment problems, inmediate adherance to standards and simple maintenance. Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Fuller [mailto:jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Miércoles, 02 de Julio de 2003 06:20 a.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML > -----Original Message----- > From: Claudio Russo [mailto:crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] I would suggest that you just download saxon ( saxon.sourecforge.net ) and go through as many examples as possible, the architectural view will emerge with this intimate experience, deal with the axiomatic idiom of xml+xslt->xml parsing first, then layer from there....yes I know, if its hard to explain....then why....sometimes just doing is the quickest route between 2 points. there are many 'grand' visions e.g. the architectural viewpoint you ask for, it depends on whom you are asking;for example those ( no offense ) older SGML'ers out there will no doubt have a document centric viewpoint ...or corba/dcom folk will no doubt be nodding their heads saying ahhhh SOA. One thing is certain, that xml and derived markups such as XSLT are an agent of change affecting said architectures. gl, jim fuller This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or any other use of this communication is strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. Stuart Lawrence Marketing Communications Limited reserves the right to monitor and intercept communications for unlawful business purposes. This also confirms that this message has been swept for viruses, although Stuart Lawrence Marketing Communications Limited accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or contents. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Which one's faster, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Jim Fuller |
Month |