Subject: RE: [xsl] XHTML to PDF From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:37:31 +0100 |
Wendell wrote: > Yes, exactly. Also, people's requirements for the PDF are so > various that a > generalized solution will also be difficult on that account. My take on this is why bother? If the source is XML, then go from the semantically marked up XML to either | both of PDF and XHTML? If its not XML... its back to Wendells position... only slightly better than sorting out bad html. regards DaveP *** snip here *** - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XHTML to PDF, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] Convert escaped XML content t, Karr, David |
Re: [xsl] Adding another layer of g, Charles Muller | Date | [xsl] checck if external xml is val, Armand Datema |
Month |