Subject: Re: [xsl] formatting xml output: inserting newlines between generated attributes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:56:02 +0100 |
> do you feel that vendors of 2.0 will still support > node-set() usage? I doubt it but if you wanted to have a 2.0 stylesheet that still sead select="xx:node-set($x)" rather than select="$x" then you could do so and use the xslt 2 facilities for function definition to define xx:node-set as a no-op function. > also, leaving aside compatibility issues, what do you think about > constructing a tree within one xslt vs. having a 2-step transform? If it's the whole document then it doesn't make a lot of difference, two steps is probably a bit kinder on the system as it can junk the initial input tree from memory after the first step, but it is _very_ convenient to process small chunks of document into a variable and then process them with a second pass in the same stylesheet, eg one pass to normalise several input forms, another to sort and number the result, ... David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] formatting xml output: in, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] formatting xml output: in, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] Re: Issues with output of, SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP | Date | Re: [xsl] Issues with output of IMG, David Carlisle |
Month |