Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:46:32 +1100 |
On 12/12/05 10:18 PM, "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My suspicion would be that Filemaker isn't asking Xalan to do the > serialization, but is doing it itself, perhaps using the serializer of a DOM > product, and is thus ignoring xsl:output entirely. This is wild speculation > of course. You could test this hypothesis by experimenting with parameters > such as indent="yes" to see if they affect the output. it does. > But it looks as if this has become a support question to be addressed to > Filemaker. indeed. at least I have the <xsl:comment> workaround. e.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] xsl split string, Philippe LAPLANCHE |
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, drkm |
Month |