|
Subject: RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:18:31 -0000 |
My suspicion would be that Filemaker isn't asking Xalan to do the serialization, but is doing it itself, perhaps using the serializer of a DOM product, and is thus ignoring xsl:output entirely. This is wild speculation of course. You could test this hypothesis by experimenting with parameters such as indent="yes" to see if they affect the output. But it looks as if this has become a support question to be addressed to Filemaker. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: drkm [mailto:darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: 12 December 2005 10:22 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? > > Eric Scheid wrote: > > > doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to > > "XALAN-based" and "XERCES-based". > > Strange. Xalan 2.7.0: > > ~/drafts/xslt $ cat empty.xsl > <xsl:transform xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; > version="1.0"> > <xsl:output method="html"/> > <xsl:template match="/"><html><br/></html></xsl:template> > </xsl:transform> > ~/drafts/xslt $ xalan -XSL empty.xsl -IN empty.xsl > <html> > <br> > </html> > ~/drafts/xslt $ > > > > Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be > > > used? So you could use a correct implementation. > > > sadly no. > > Not so funny :-( > > --drkm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > _____________ > Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau > Yahoo! Messenger > Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, drkm | Thread | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid |
| Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid | Date | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid |
| Month |