|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTML in an XML file and transformation to XSL:FO From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:04:38 +0100 |
> That's an interesting point - can you have a well-formed XML > document that isn't namespace-well-formed? Yes, you can. No-one uses them nowadays, but in principle you can have a document that conforms to the base XML recommendation but doesn't conform to the Namespaces Rec. XSLT has always insisted that the source document conforms to both. > > Is it that "well-formed" existed before namespaces came > along, and now saying "well-formed" means both? > No, to require both you have to specify "namespace-well-formed". Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, andrew welch |
| Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, Florent Georges | Date | [xsl] Re: Wrapping problem, Kent Seegmiller |
| Month |