Subject: Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:19:34 GMT |
> therefore it is necessary that we follow l10n rules. yes but often the i18n lookup table with the language translations is separate from the actual document, which often makes it easier to add new translations. If your translations are "inline" then all you need to to is remove the <xsl:for-each select="//entry"> and </xsl:for-each> lines. Also I note that you are splitting the locale on _ rather than - . - would be more normal for language codes such as en-uk (ISO 639-1 or ISO 639-2). David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, Nicolas Van Cleemput | Thread | Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, Nicolas Van Cleemput |
Re: [xsl] "Line"-Tokenizing at <br/, Georges Schmitz | Date | RE: [xsl] How to define a custom co, Michael Kay |
Month |