Re: [xsl] Shorthand.

[Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>]

Steve wrote:
> ...I read and replied to what you quoted. In reply I provided the
> template I have, 

really? If that really was your template, consider the suggestion I did 
to use ASP instead, it will save you a lot of time.

> its usage in context, 

There was no context, only the root match (and with 'context' I meant: 
the context of your problem, not the context of the node, but you 
provided neither). Nothing about how your input data looks like, your 
parameters, the way you call your template, the context at large how you 
use it and why you chose this solution.

> and my expected output.

surely you don't use a whole template with fixed data to generate a 
link? Including an XML file an printing it is easier.

> I also
> replied with my processor, etc. 

yes, thanks. Pls do that in the original post (see list guidelines).

> If something else was expected it was
> my mistake.

no problem, we all need to learn and asking clear questions is often 
harder than providing clear solutions.

Cheers,
-- Abel