Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0 From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:41:47 +0530 |
The following example could also be worth discussing ... Please consider this 2.0 stylesheet: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:a="http://localhost/myfunctions" version="2.0"> <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" /> <xsl:template match="/"> <result> <xsl:value-of select="a:f()" /> </result> </xsl:template> <xsl:function name="a:f" as="xs:integer"> <xsl:sequence select="10" /> </xsl:function> </xsl:stylesheet> The output produced is: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <result xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:a="http://localhost/my functions">10</result> Logically, I think (from end user's point of view) having the function namespace by default coming into the output is not that good. I would like to learn, what did the language designers had in mind (i.e., the logic behind it), while deciding what namespace should be copied to the output and which not ? On 5/6/08, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Indeed, I'm not proposing any changes, it's no big deal - just > > pointing out (or perhaps looking for confirmation) that the xml schema > > namespace could easily have been excluded by default. > > If "to" had allowed double as well as integer then most stylesheets > could easily avoid declaring the xs namespace, which would make the > whole problem go away. If you are really using an XSD-specific datatype > such as date handling, it seems to me perfectly reasonable to have to > declare (and exclude) the xs namespace, but I do curse every time I have > to add an xs namespace just so I can go > select="1 to xs:integer(something)" > > David -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] What to use instead of xs, Michael Ludwig | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Michael Kay |
Month |