|
Subject: Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than one item From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:36:05 +0100 |
> Adding a test inside the position()=last()
> clause accounts for the case of two members, which presumably
> shouldn't get a comma between them.
Putting a , before the and in a list is anyway a transatlantic
peversion, so in English as (usually) practiced in England
you could lose the
<xsl:if test="position() > 2">
<xsl:text>,</xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
> The problem of transposing from singular to plural forms reliably in
> English requires either NLP or at least a lookup table with all your
> possible terms;
true but in this case the vocabulary is probably fairly restricted, so a
lookup table plus a fallback case of sticking an s on the end for
anything not in the table is probably workable.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than , Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] starts-with on more than , Michael Kay |
| Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than , Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] starts-with on more than , Michael Kay |
| Month |