Re: [xsl] the future of xslt

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. David Peterson
<m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:55:40 -0600, bryan rasmussen
> <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.google.com/trends?q=xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xml+stylesheet&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
>
> Who would actually search for the term "xml stylesheet"?  This is a
> meaningless comparison.

I don't know, maybe you should ask Phillip Fearon who I was replying
to when he said:
QUOTE
These graphs are interesting, but one of the reasons why its difficult
to draw conclusions from search trends on their own is the variety of
keywords (such as 'XSL', 'XSLT 2.0' or 'XML Stylesheet') that may be
used in a search .

/QUOTE

I didn't put the XSL-T 2.0 in because obviously 2.0 would be part of
any XSLT search and I made the XSLT search.


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen