Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

[Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> Pointing to non-standard extension functions and possibly
    Scott> insecure (or locked) protocols to do what, admittedly, seem
    Scott> like hacks in XSLT isn't a real substitute for a
    Scott> well-designed (perhaps even standardized) XML language
    Scott> designed specifically to deal with the day-to-day
    Scott> requirements of an average webserver.

There are no languages designed to do these things - only languages
with library routines.

So you are right that it's not a substitute - it's the same thing.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire