Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:53:08 +0100 |
> All fairly trivial. For example a custom handler coupled with IIS 7.0 and > you could have that up-and-running within a day. Well I would use Saxon with Glassfish or Tomcat... but I guess you have Saxon.net so it is possible with IIS. Either way implementing it yourself is easy. With SOA being the big thing at the moment, XSLT is easily one of the best placed languages to combine those services into XHTML... the way I see it, XSLT 2.0 is _the_ serverside language of the future... Reading and writing XML and inbuilt XML types will just be redundant in an end-to-end XML stack. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Joe Fawcett | Thread | RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda |
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Houghton,Andrew | Date | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Michael Ludwig |
Month |