Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL editor recommendation From: "Ferry, Jeremy" <Jeremy_Ferry@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:46:18 -0400 |
I'm also using oXygen... love it. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 3:56 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL editor recommendation I use oXygen - it does have a bit of a learning curve and might not endear itself to you instantly, but once setup correctly it has some great features that a non-XSLT editor just couldn't give you and I wouldn't be without now: simple things like correctly highlighting errors for compiled stylesheet modules, and jumping around template and variable references and declarations, and of course debugging which is essential (especially if you graduated from the school of xsl:message debugging :) It does a lot more than just XSLT though, which can be a pro or a con depending on your perspective. I can happily recommend it, but sadly it's not free. The academic version is pretty reasonable though. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL editor recommendation, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL editor recommendation, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] keep-together property, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL editor recommendation, Robert Koberg |
Month |