Subject: Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question From: mark bordelon <markcbordelon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks, Mozer. My specifications are very general involving inclusion of the root node with the xpath result. I need to use xpath with asp.net to write a servlet which returns this as xml So my solution will neccesarily take an xpath expression as servlet input and return the xpath, assumingly needing to go the route of XmlDocument.SelectNodes(). --- On Fri, 8/29/08, mozer <xmlizer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: mozer <xmlizer@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, August 29, 2008, 1:08 PM > Mark, > > I think I was misunderstanding your question, because I > undestood that > you wanted to construct a tree as a result > > The fact is that XmlDocument.SelectNodes() only takes XPath > > So you should follow the path drawn by Colin > > Xmlizer > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:01 PM, mark bordelon > <markcbordelon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Xmlizer, thanks for the quick response! > > > > Following your post, is there a simple enough xsl > solution that could be passed to > > XmlDocument.SelectNodes(xslstr) to acheive the > nodelist I want? > > > > > > --- On Fri, 8/29/08, Xmlizer > <xmlizer+xsllist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> From: Xmlizer <xmlizer+xsllist@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question > >> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Date: Friday, August 29, 2008, 12:12 PM > >> that's not possible to do with XPath only > >> > >> But with XSLT you can > >> > >> Xmlizer > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, mark bordelon > >> <markcbordelon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > All *help*! > >> > > >> > What is the best way to query xml with xpath > to get a > >> disjoint nodelist? Specifically i want to include > just the > >> root node alongwith a descendent node. > >> > > >> > XML: > >> > > >> > <a> > >> > <b> > >> > <c> > >> > </c> > >> > </b> > >> > </a> > >> > > >> > XPATH: > >> > > >> > //c > >> > > >> > DESIRED RESULT NODELIST: > >> > i.e. not this: > >> > <c> > >> > </c> > >> > > >> > but rather this: > >> > <a> > >> > <c> > >> > </c> > >> > </a>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question, mozer | Thread | [xsl] Commented contents not consid, V.Ramkumar |
Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question, mark bordelon | Date | Re: [xsl] (simple?) xpath question, Evan Lenz |
Month |