Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:27:02 +0000 |
>> I often have two namespaces for each library: a public one >> (declaring global constructs users of the black box are allowed >> to override) and a private one (declaring global constructs users >> of the black box are not allowed to override). > > I also use this technique. I wonder what naming scheme people here > use for the private namespace URI. I've often thought Final and Abstract type modifiers would be useful, maybe now would be a good time to submit a proposal for 2.1. We can already simulate Abstract, but an explicit attribute could be preferable to throwing an error in a named template, or a missing select on a required parameter (or a typed variable etc). -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] Timezone concept broken i, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges |
Month |