Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:56:06 +0300 |
is Marklogic use own XSLT engine? XSLT engine integrated with database engine look like very powerfull but also sound like "too good to be true" 2010/1/18 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical. >> >> So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again. >> >> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java >> (notwithstanding .Net autoport)), >> does *any other* community really want one?" > > As was mentioned earlier in the thread, Intel and IBM both have their > own commercial xslt 2.0 processors, and MarkLogic is adding xslt 2.0 > support in version 5... (because of popular demand) > > Everyone wants XSLT 2.0, it's the best! > > > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay |
Month |