Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:22:32 +1030 |
2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:First, thanks to all for replies to my inquiry on this thread and also many thanks to Abel Braaksma for seeding this discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical.
So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again.
"Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java
(notwithstanding .Net autoport)),
does *any other* community really want one?"
As was mentioned earlier in the thread, Intel and IBM both have their own commercial xslt 2.0 processors, and MarkLogic is adding xslt 2.0 support in version 5... (because of popular demand)
Everyone wants XSLT 2.0, it's the best!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Output file name as per i, Ganesh Babu N | Date | RE: [xsl] Output file name as per i, Selvaganesh |
Month |