Subject: Re: [xsl] When to use text() From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:42:18 +0000 |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:31 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21/03/2014 17:19, Ihe Onwuka wrote: >> >> The quirkiness derives from giving it an innocuous intuit inducing >> moniker like text() that leads the consumer astray. > > > > I don't think you have ever said what you _expect_ it to do. > See reply to Martin Holmes. > > Perhaps you'd want it to do what string() does but > that's called string() not text():-) > You see there right where the smiley is, is where we differ. I don't see that as anything to smile about. To me thats just thats a smart alec distinction.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] When to use text(), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Graydon |
Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Graydon | Date | Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Ihe Onwuka |
Month |