Subject: Re: [xsl] Things that make you go Hmmmm! From: Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:17:30 -0400 |
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:56:47PM +0000, Alex Muir scripsit: > text() deserve this rename treatment. Urm... no. Not unless we can get text nodes renamed in XML. It really is a text node. {} is attribute value templates () is functions or node-tests [] is indexes of sequences :: is an axis : separates namespace from local name so not obvious where some other syntax for node-tests could be found; (text) looks odd, text% looks like a mistake, %text% looks like a serious mistake. > copy-all and copy-root would be more clear. copy-shallow sounds like > it could be in between the 2 maybe. Urgh. Thing is, despite copy-of being the usual source of confusion, copy is the complicated one; copy of an attribute or a processing instruction or a comment returns the whole node. It's only with element nodes that you get "a new node with the same name as the context node", and I don't think "copy-name-if-element-otherwise-node" is an improvement. -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, Alex Muir | Thread | Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, Ihe Onwuka |
Re: [xsl] XSLT Hello World - outrea, Paul Tyson | Date | Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, David Carlisle |
Month |