Subject: Re: [xsl] Things that make you go Hmmmm! From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:55:03 +0000 |
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:23 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Upgrading from 1 to 2 (and soon from 2 to 3) was largely painless > precisely because the vast majority of code just worked. If XSLT3 > had purely cosmetic function name changes it would be massively disruptive. Really sounds very easily automated to adjust function names in code. I admit I didn't have to go through an upgrade process. I just started writing xslt 2 templates and left my xslt 1.0 templates as they were. >Urm... no. Not unless we can get text nodes renamed in XML. It really >is a text node. I guess the only point of confusion was the number of text nodes returned deep-text() or all-text-nodes(), something like that might have made things more clear. Actually to be honest I don't care much about that. It should though be easier to change things in a language if they are really a source for misunderstanding from my viewpoint. Changing something like a name moving from one version to another can't be that problematic. -- - Alex Muir http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/alex-muir/36/ab7/125
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, David Carlisle |
Month |